Resumen

WARIKANDWA, Tapiwa Victor  y  USEBIU, Lineekela. A proposal for international arbitration law in Namibia based on the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. De Jure (Pretoria) [online]. 2023, vol.56, n.1, pp.259-279. ISSN 2225-7160.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2225-7160/2023/v56a18.

International business arbitration is not covered by Namibia's present arbitration law, the Arbitration Act 42 of 1965 (the Act). There is no explicit language in the Act that addresses foreign arbitration as the Act, solely by default, covers national or domestic arbitration. When it comes to international arbitration, the Act has many flaws. Modern commercial arbitrations are increasingly being guided by the Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (MLICA) of UNCITRAL (the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law) or by state legislation that has been influenced by it. It is undeniable that Namibia must embrace MLICA, including the majority of the 2006 revisions of the MLICA, in order to participate in the global economic village. Furthermore, Namibia has not yet ratified the 1958-adopted New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (CREFAA), which has been hailed as the most effective treaty governing global trade. This article suggests that Namibia should implement both the MLICA and the CREFAA. If this strategy is not adopted, businesses in Namibia will be hesitant to engage in international business transactions due to the lack of legal certainty that the New York Convention and contemporary domestic arbitration legislation bring.

Palabras clave : commercial arbitration law; Arbitration Act 42 of 1965; Namibia; International Commercial Arbitration.

        · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )