SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.33 número1SA Rugby Injury and Illness Surveillance and Prevention Project (SARIISPP) The Currie Cup Premiership Competition Injury Surveillance Report 2019Year of the face mask: do's and don'ts during exercise índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


South African Journal of Sports Medicine

versión On-line ISSN 2078-516X
versión impresa ISSN 1015-5163

Resumen

SINGH, V; STOKES, K; TREWARTHA, G  y  MCKAY, C. The reliability of the scapular posture and scapular dyskinesis tests in rugby union players. SA J. Sports Med. [online]. 2021, vol.33, n.1, pp.1-7. ISSN 2078-516X.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2078-516x/2021/v33i1a11674.

BACKGROUND: Impact forces during rugby can contribute to scapula dysfunction and shoulder pain. Reliable assessment of static and dynamic scapula position is paramount in managing athletes with, and those at risk of developing, shoulder pain. OBJECTIVES: To determine the reliability of static scapular posture (SP), clavicular tilt angle (CTA) and the scapular dyskinesis (SD) assessments by expert and student therapists. METHODS: The study design was an inter-rater and intra-rater reliability study in male university level rugby union players. Four sport rehabilitation students and one experienced physiotherapist evaluated the position of the scapular and clavicle of male university-level rugby union players (interrater participants: session 1: n=17, session 2: n=12 and session 3: n=16; (intra-rater participants: n = 12). Participants attended 3 testing sessions, each 1 week apart. Scapular orientation and motion were assessed in five planes of movement and using the Scapular Dyskinesis Test (SDT) respectively. The interrater analysis included all participants from each session, while in the intra-rater analysis included only the 12 participants who attended all three testing sessions. RESULTS: Kappa coefficient values and percentage agreement ratings for students compared to the experienced therapist were: SP=poor to fair (-0.01 to 0.33), (27% - 94%); SDT=slight (0.16; 41%); CTA=fair (0.21; 59%). Test-retest (intra-rater) agreement was fair to moderate (0.22 - 0.44; 69% - 95%), slight (0.12; 47%), and fair (0.39; 77%) for the SP, SDT, and CTA, respectively. CONCLUSION: Static and dynamic evaluation of the shoulder by students and an experienced therapist has poor to moderate reliability and should not be used to make clinical decisions based on observation alone.

Palabras clave : shoulder; musculoskeletal assessment.

        · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons