SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.51 issue1 author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

    Related links

    • On index processCited by Google
    • On index processSimilars in Google

    Share


    In die Skriflig

    On-line version ISSN 2305-0853Print version ISSN 1018-6441

    Abstract

    STANDER, Hennie F.. A response to Van der Watt's article on 'Intertextuality and over-interpretation: References to Genesis 28:12 in John 1:51?'. In Skriflig (Online) [online]. 2017, vol.51, n.1, pp.1-5. ISSN 2305-0853.  https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v51i1.2266.

    This article is a response to an article of Van der Watt titled 'Intertextuality and over-interpretation: References to Genesis 28:12 in John 1:51?' (2016). He states in this article that his aim is 'to illustrate the dangers of over-interpretation when dealing with intertextual relations between texts, especially when allusion is assumed'. He then gives a brief survey of different interpretations of John 1:51. Van der Watt shows in his article how theologians use themes from Genesis 28:12 (like the ladder, Jacob or Bethel, which are not mentioned in John 1:51) in their expositions of John 1:51. Van der Watt regards some of these expositions as examples of over-interpretation. The aim of my article is to show how Church Fathers interpreted Genesis 28:12 and John 1:51. I show in my article that the Church Fathers saw several parallels between these two sections from the Bible. Furthermore, I suggest that the early theologians' interpretations formed a tradition that probably influenced modern interpreters of the Bible. I also discuss the role of typology in the history of interpretation, specifically also in the case of Genesis 28:12 and John 1:51. I then argue that it is perhaps not so far-fetched to see an intertextual relation between Genesis 28:12 and John 1:51.

            · text in Afrikaans     · Afrikaans ( pdf )