SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.63 issue1 author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

    Related links

    • On index processCited by Google
    • On index processSimilars in Google

    Share


    South African Journal of Communication Disorders

    On-line version ISSN 2225-4765Print version ISSN 0379-8046

    Abstract

    MAKHOBA, Musa  and  JOSEPH, Neethie. Practices and views of audiologists regarding aural rehabilitation services for adults with acquired hearing loss. S. Afr. J. Commun. Disord. [online]. 2016, vol.63, n.1, pp.1-10. ISSN 2225-4765.  https://doi.org/10.4102/sajcd.v63i1.155.

    BACKGROUND: Hearing loss in adults is one of the leading disabilities globally. It is managed through aural rehabilitation for which there is a paucity of literature in South Africa. This raises the question of interest, the integrity of holistic service provision amongst audiologists and whether interest and challenges affect current practices. OBJECTIVES: To describe audiologists' practices and views on aural rehabilitation services for adults, including interest and challenges experienced. METHOD: A descriptive online survey was completed by 45 of 1440 invited practicing audiologists who were members of the two national professional associations in South Africa. Each association emailed the questionnaire link to all its members. Data were analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 21, and included the paired samples f-test and chi-squared tests. RESULTS: The most provided services were hearing aids (81.4%), communication strategies training (69.8%) and informational counselling (79.8%). A strong interest was reported by most for each service. Challenges included limited client compliance, unaffordability of services, limited undergraduate training, language barriers, unrealistic expectations and individual differences. Statistically significant differences between service provision, interest and challenges indicated that these are influential but not individually significant to service provision. CONCLUSION: Imbalanced service provision, high interest and many more challenges are experienced. These factors contribute but are not solely markedly influential in service provision.

            · text in English     · English ( pdf )