SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.26 issue1Modelling asymmetric relationship between exports and growth in a developing economy: Evidence from NamibiaThe limits of laws: Traffic law enforcement in South Africa author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences

On-line version ISSN 2222-3436
Print version ISSN 1015-8812

Abstract

BUSSIN, Mark; WOCKE, Albert  and  DEYSEL, Benno. The impact of remuneration governance on chief executive officer overpayment. S. Afr. j. econ. manag. sci. [online]. 2023, vol.26, n.1, pp.1-10. ISSN 2222-3436.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v26i1.4860.

BACKGROUND: Chief executive officer (CEO) payment and company performance are highly controversial, and existing research has focused on this link for decades. The study was conducted in South Africa where corporate governance regulators have introduced measures to improve the relationship between CEO pay and performance AIM: This research aimed to explore the problem by extending Pepper and Gore's (2015) behavioural agency theory to examine the moderating effect of remuneration governance on the CEO pay - company performance relationship SETTING: The study focused on the Top 100 listed companies in which several regulations concerning CEO pay were introduced, which provided the opportunity to examine such regulations on the alignment of CEO pay and company performance METHOD: Panel data from 67 company annual reports were analysed over two decades with 871 datapoints, divided into three periods corresponding with the introduction of regulations. Analyses included corrected panel standard errors and estimated generalised least squared hierarchical multiple regression and moderated multiple regression analyses RESULTS: Results showed a statistically significant positive relationship between company performance measures and total CEO remuneration (including long-term incentives [LTIs]) for each of the three periods. We found that LTIs tied to performance-vested criteria and CEO minimum shareholding do enhance pay-performance sensitivity. Results further suggest that the behavioural agency theory is incomplete and researchers should consider the role of remuneration governance in moderating CEO overpayment CONCLUSION: Remuneration governance should be refined through the inclusion of retrospective CEO remuneration disclosure to increase pay-performance sensitivity CONTRIBUTION: This research contributes to knowledge of CEO payment and company performance

Keywords : CEO remuneration; pay-performance sensitivity; corporate governance; share-based payments; behavioural agency theory; CEO overpayment.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License