SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.27 issue1The knowledge, awareness and practices of radiation safety amongst orthopaedic surgeonsHysterosalpingographic evaluation of human immunodeficiency virus-infected and uninfected infertile women author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

    Related links

    • On index processCited by Google
    • On index processSimilars in Google

    Share


    SA Journal of Radiology

    On-line version ISSN 2078-6778Print version ISSN 1027-202X

    Abstract

    WENTZEL, Mari; JANSE VAN RENSBURG, Jacques  and  TERBLANS, Jacobus J.. Radiology blues: Comparing occupational blue-light exposure to recommended safety standards. S. Afr. J. radiol. (Online) [online]. 2023, vol.27, n.1, pp.1-9. ISSN 2078-6778.  https://doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v27i1.2522.

    BACKGROUND: The blue-light hazard is a well-documented entity addressing the detrimental health effects of high-energy visible light photons in the range of 305 nm - 450 nm. Radiologists spend long hours in front of multiple light-emitting diode (LED)-based diagnostic monitors emitting blue light, predisposing them to potentially higher blue-light dosages than other health professionals. OBJECTIVES: The authors aimed to quantify the blue light that radiology registrars are exposed to in daily viewing of diagnostic monitors and compared this with international occupational safety standards. METHOD: A limited cross-sectional observational study was conducted. Four radiology registrars at two academic hospitals in Bloemfontein from 01 October 2021 to 30 November 2021 participated. Diagnostic monitor viewing times on a standard workday were determined. Different image modalities obtained from 01 June 2019 to 30 November 2019 were assessed, and blue-light radiance was determined using a spectroscope and image analysis software. Blue-light radiance values were compared with international safety standards RESULTS: Radiology registrars spent on average 380 min in front of a diagnostic display unit daily. Blue-light radiance from diagnostic monitors was elevated in higher-intensity images such as chest radiographs and lower for darker images like MRI brain studies. The total blue-light radiance from diagnostic display units was more than 10 000 times below the recommended threshold value for blue-light exposure. CONCLUSION: Blue-light radiance from diagnostic displays measured well below the recommended values for occupational safety. Hence, blue-light exposure from diagnostic monitors does not significantly add to the occupational health burden of radiologists. CONTRIBUTION: Despite spending long hours in front of diagnostic monitors, radiologists' exposure to effective blue-light radiance from monitors was far below hazardous values. This suggests that blue-light exposure from diagnostic monitors does not increase the occupational health burden of radiologists.

    Keywords : blue-light hazard; ocular health radiology; blue-light radiance; occupational blue-light hazard; blue-light exposure; safe occupational exposure.

            · text in English     · English ( pdf )