SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.23 issue1A Comparative Analysis of the Application of the 1951 Refugee Convention to Victims of Sexual Violence in South Africa, Tanzania and UgandaPoverty as a Ground of Indirect Discrimination in the Allocation of Police Resources - A Discussion of Social Justice Coalition v Minister of Police 2019 4 SA 82 (WCC) author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

    Related links

    • On index processCited by Google
    • On index processSimilars in Google

    Share


    Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal (PELJ)

    On-line version ISSN 1727-3781

    Abstract

    GELDENHUYS, J  and  KELLY-LOUW, M. Jurisdictional and Procedural Technicalities in Hate Speech Cases: South African Human Rights Commission v Khumalo 2019 1 SA 289 (GJ). PER [online]. 2020, vol.23, n.1, pp.1-33. ISSN 1727-3781.  https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2020/v23i0a7145.

    The jurisdiction or competence of the Equality Court to hear a dispute concerning alleged hate speech is affected by various jurisdictional factors. The decision in South African Human Rights Commission v Khumalo 2019 1 All SA 254 (GJ) reveals several shortcomings in the provisions regulating jurisdiction in the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000 which must be attended to in order to provide clarity and legitimacy in regard to the application of the protection against hate speech.

    Keywords : Concurrent jurisdiction; geographical jurisdiction; jurisdictional facts; locus standi; hate speech; racial slurs; racism; unfair discrimination.

            · text in English     · English ( pdf )