Different Perspectives on Poverty in Proverbs , Sirach , and 4 QInstruction : Wisdom in Transit

Poverty is referred to in Proverbs, as well as Sirach and 4QInstruction. These books do show some mutual tendencies, shared elements and a similar mode of literature, but are also part of a dynamic process. Reference to poverty in these books is therefore linked to the changing provenance of each of these books. The use of wisdom language to refer to this phenomenon, was in flux, dynamically moving from one era to a next, from one scenario to another. This paper proposes that the literal as well as metaphorical use of poverty in the book of Proverbs was followed by a more literal use in Ben Sirach and a more metaphorical meaning in 4QInstructions.


INTRODUCTION
The books of Proverbs, Sirach and 4QInstruction have a "family resemblance." 2 These books show some mutual tendencies, shared elements and a similar "mode of literature." 3 But they are also part of a dynamic process.The activity of people expressing themselves mainly in terms of what can be called wisdom language, was in flux, dynamically moving from one era to a next, from one scenario to another.Adams 4 rightly titled his publication "Wisdom in Transition." This article studies the idea of poverty as it appears in the books of Proverbs, Sirach and 4QInstruction5 within the context of the evolving trends in sapiential literature during the time of the Second Temple (516 BCE-70 CE).Wright calls the theme of "riches and poverty," one of the most important 3 indicates that a wide spectrum of positions is found on Wisdom.Some see it as a tradition, others hold the older paradigm position that wisdom literature is a foreign body (a Fremdkörper) to the rest of the Bible, and others take a mid-position between these two views.Will Kynes, "The Modern Scholarly Wisdom Tradition and the Threat of Pan-Sapientialism: A Case Report," in Was there a Wisdom Tradition?New Prospects in Israelite Wisdom Studies, ed.Mark R. Sneed (Atlanta: SBL Press, 2015), 11-38, agrees with Sneed that wisdom is one of several complementary modes in the HB.These texts can no longer be read only in terms of a genre.This is restrictive.There are "intertextual connections" (Kyne, "Modern Scholarly," 32) between these texts and the rest of the HB and they cannot be ascribed "to a particular ancient tradition or movement complete with its own social setting and group of authors and tradents" (Kyne, "Modern Scholarly," 32).On the other hand, it cannot be denied that these texts "share some basic premises in their understanding of the world that are different from the premises reflected in other books of the Old Testament."See Annette Schellenberg, "Don't Throw the Baby Out with the Bathwater: On the Distinctiveness of the Sapiential Understanding of the World," in Was there a Wisdom Tradition?New Prospects in Israelite Wisdom Studies, ed.Mark R. Sneed (Atlanta: SBL Press, 2015), 116.When compared to the Torah, the prophetical literature, the apocalyptic and the historical literature, the wisdom literature shows a unique purpose, and an individual mode (cf.Sneed, "Elusive Attempt," 47-48).These books are to be read in terms of a mutual affinity with a unique focus, not imitating "generic conventions" (Sneed, "Elusive Attempt," 62), but rather generating new conventions within an intertextual and dynamic context.4   Samuel L. Adams, Wisdom in Transition: Act and Consequence in Second Temple Instructions, JSJSup (Leiden, Brill, 2008).In his study he not only discussed the progress made in present Sapiential studies since Klaus Koch's 1951 theory of a Tun-Ergehen-Zusammenhang (deed-result-coherence) (Klaus Koch, "Gibt es ein Vergeltungsdogma im Alten Testament?"ZTK 52 [1951]: 1-42) in proverbial wisdom literature, but also discusses the transitional character of wisdom literature during the Second Temple period.He pays attention to the development during the last centuries BCE which was influenced by some changes, i.a. the rise in some sections of Judaism in the belief of after-life.In 4QInstruction, e.g., death and the prospect of living in a world beyond death is a very prominent theme.
issues in these books, even more than that, one of the "most pervasive topics in Jewish wisdom." 6

B POVERTY IN THE BOOK OF PROVERBS
The oldest material for the purpose of our study is found in the book of Proverbs.It is difficult to exactly date the book of Proverbs.This compendium of "previously existing collections" 7 was probably finalised during the postexilic period.In all likelihood, it was compiled "in the Persian period (539-333 BCE)." 8 It is definitely older than Ben Sirach and 4QInstruction, and was in all probability one of the sources both these works utilised. 1

The Provenance of Proverbs
Those who see the book of Proverbs as representing a wisdom tradition, link its provenance to scribes and sages.the study of these terms leads directly to the social character of the book of Proverbs.It is not possible to "give an undistorted description even of the social idealization of folk wisdom, let alone of the social realities underlying it." 11There is, however, consensus among scholars that these proverbs reflect "an aristocratic worldview and ethos." 12These words show the beliefs and mental attitude of an educated class of people.These people lived in the cities.The proverbs they used reflect the ideas of those who "were in political and social upper echelons of power and wealth."The terminology used in what can be called (mainly) sapiential literature "reveals a startling contrast" 14 with that used in the prophetic literature and the Psalms.In contrast to the prophetic literature the different proverbs display an "ambivalence" 15 in attitude toward the poor.The sages had a "divergent understanding of poverty." 16Poverty was seen as part and parcel of the social structure, but poverty also brought about dire consequences (Prov 14:20; 18:23; 22:7).Poverty was also seen as the result of laziness (Prov 6:6-11; 10:4-5; 24:30-34; 26:13-16) and of wickedness (Prov 12:3; 13:25, 33).Righteous people were also found among the poor (Prov 15:16-17; 16: 16 and 19; 17:1; 28:6).The wise will not oppress the poor, as that would be an insult to the One who created him (Prov 14:31).Due to competing viewpoints among different groups and to ever-changing social circumstances the viewpoint on poverty was changed and reformulated from time to time.Pleins would rather see the terms for poverty as having "heuristic value" 17 than referring to literal poverty.These words were used to teach the student "the proper attitude toward wealth and wisdom." 18t only does the term "poor" have various levels of meaning, but several other themes are also found in the wisdom rhetoric of Proverbs.Perdue points out themes like "wisdom leads to theological understanding and ethical conduct" 19 and "wisdom as goddess and instrument of creation." 20Themes like "creation and justice," 21 "creation and theodicy," 22 "creation and economic justice," 23 "creation and the poor," 24 "organs of perception and knowledge," 25 and "Yahweh as Creator of rich and poor," 26 are also found in Proverbs.Poverty as Metaphor Perdue's thesis is that creation expressed through cultural metaphors is the "central theological theme of the sages." 27The sages used metaphors they took over from mythic traditions of the ANE.They structured an imaginary world with a variety of metaphors to portray the cosmos as the creation of God in which he instilled a specific order.Perdue 28 arranges these metaphors of the sages into four categories: "divine creation and providence," "creation and anthropology," "creation and goddess Wisdom," and "sapiential creation and the discourse of power."Within this context Perdue states that the poor's right is based "on a sapiential understanding of creation and providence." 29As creator of the world, God was the supports humanity.He blesses the righteous, protects and provides for the poor, and castigates the wicked.Both rich and poor were created by God.Justice requires one to pay respect and support all categories of people.While ancient Israel's social system, as formulated in the Law, was generally based on family relationship and charity to give alms to the poor, the support of the poor in Proverbs is rather based on the way the sages saw and interpreted the world as God's creation.

Sandoval and Loader
The issue of Proverbs' use of metaphors play a central role in the debate between Sandoval (2006) and Loader (2006).Timothy Sandoval 30 proposes that a "critical mass of proverbs … reveals a certain moral vision and certain patterns of figurative use of wealth and poverty language in Proverbs."He proposes therefore a figurative reading of Proverbs.Alfred Loader opposes this "overtly figurative reading" 31 and indicates that "literal readings are not only possible, but also necessary" 32 when reading Proverbs.
Several moral discourses are found in the HB.According to Sandoval 33 the discourse of wealth and poverty is not only found in the book of Proverbs next to other themes, but is in fact the main theme of that book.The book comprises of "three distinct sub-discourses." 34These overlapping discourses are "wisdom's virtues discourse," 35 "a discourse of social justice," 36 and "a discourse of social observation." 37Sandoval follows Ricoeur's 38 known advocacy that a text is able to construct a symbolic world for the reader.The discourses in Proverbs are metaphorical, creating a world of ideas for the readers.The main discourse of wealth and poverty in Proverbs on both textual as well as extra-textual level presents a "matrix of symbolic associations and patterns of value." 39This matrix applies to not only wealth and poverty, but also to matters like social status, value, and identity.
The discourse of wealth and poverty is generally held to be ambiguous or inconsistent. 40Scholars usually ascribe this amphibology either to the complex reality they observed, or to a variety of social provenances for the collected sayings in the book.Sandoval does not agree with his view of ambiguity.According to Sandoval these texts are nearly always read in literal terms.Sandoval finds an "appeal to historical development or multiple social contexts" 41 unsatisfactory to explain these different levels.He rather prefers to read the book's moral discourse according to its "metaphorical nature." 42The "figurative interpretative possibilities" 43 of the text invites the reader to explore its "figurative qualities." 44It should not be understood "in overly literal fashion." 45cording to Sandoval, Proverbs constructs "a symbolic view of the world" 46 which represents "the true nature of the cosmos." 47This structure promotes beliefs and moralities that see wealth as a virtue to be sought and poverty as something to be avoided.In the sub-discourse of social justice, however, a personal vocabulary for the poor is implemented.Rather than depicting wealth and poor in terms of a virtue discourse, these terms are indicating a "particular economic ethic" 48 as part of a social discourse.The learner is sensitised to the position of those who are poor and learned to be kind to "economically marginalized persons." 49The third discourse (next to that on virtue and sociality), the discourse of "social observation," 50 indicates the effect of wealth and poverty in society.These three sub-discourses overlap each other and prevents one from understanding wealth and poverty only in terms of an act-consequence construction.It is therefore Sandoval's thesis that the sayings in Proverbs disclose "a certain moral vision and certain patterns of figurative use of wealth and poverty language." 51ader is not convinced that a single hermeneutical perspective, whether it is metaphorical or symbolical, can be found in the book of Proverbs.The topics referred to in the book are too variegated to reduce the coherence of the book to one unitary moral vision.The coherence rather exists in the use of several sapiential 52 perspectives and central 53 motifs.Cohesiveness is also advanced by an "impressive literary employment of figures," 54 including metaphors and an array of poetic techniques.
Loader does not agree with Sandoval's view that the figurative language used in the prologue in Prov 1:1-7 provides a "hermeneutical cue for a metaphorical understanding" 55 of the rest of Proverbs.A metaphorical reading is indeed invited by some of the language used in the book, but a metaphorical reading "cannot be generalised to such an extent that metaphorical readings are privileged." 56According to Loader, to understand Prov 1:7 as an indicator to read all of the book of Proverbs "with a sensitivity to figurative aphorisms and motifs is greatly exaggerated." 57ader sees the book of Proverbs as an anthology of materials collected for teaching life skills to others.The book sharpens the didactic skills of established sages.The book enables them to use "even the most enigmatic sapiential literary genres" 58 when teaching others about wisdom.Although many of the genres used by them make a metaphorical understanding possible, there are many cases where such an understanding is unnecessary, and sometimes even impossible.An aphorism can even contain a literary metaphor, but that does not mean that it is to be understood metaphorically. 5950 Sandoval, Discourse, 207. 51Sandoval, Discourse, 208. 52Loader, "Metaphorical," 1197, indicates perspectives "such as the creational order, the deed-consequence nexus and the religious mooring of wisdom." 53Loader, "Metaphorical," 1197, mentions motives like "concept of wisdom, discipline and human possibilities." 54Loader, "Metaphorical," 1197. 55Loader, "Metaphorical," 1188. 56Loader, "Metaphorical," 1188. 57Loader, "Metaphorical," 1187. 58Loader, "Metaphorical," 1186. 59Cf.Loader, "Metaphorical," 1196.
It can be agreed with Loader that it is not tenable to privilege a metaphorical reading.Even when reading Proverbs metaphorically, too many metaphors are used to single out the metaphors for poverty as the centre of Proverbs.On the other hand, relating the metaphors and references to a social world of which so little is really known, makes the speech act when reading of Proverbs less effective.Sandoval is correct to pay attention to the metaphorical aspect as well.Perdue indicated clearly the sages' "substantial use of metaphors in their teaching about the two related creation traditions: … cosmology and anthropology."60

Summary Proverbs
Proverbs is a variegated collection of newer and older wisdom sayings.It was finalised in the post-exilic time, probable during the Persian period.It's provenance was the educated elite.The sayings display an ambivalent attitude towards the poor.Some, like Pleins,61 understand the reference to poverty as a heuristic tool rather than a literal indication of deprivation.Perdue62 links poverty to the cultural metaphors used for creation in Proverbs.Sandoval sees the metaphor of wealth and poverty as the main theme in Proverbs.Loader does not agree with a metaphorical reading of Proverbs, at least not as the privileged strategy.There are several sapiential perspectives in Proverbs and poverty and they are used in a constellation of terms.The term poverty is to be understood in literal sense as well, if not most of the time.Sneed63 and Kynes64 advise that the wisdom in Proverbs be understood in terms of a complimentary mode.Poverty is not only to be read within a larger context of ideas in Proverbs, but also in terms of an intertextual context.
This ambivalence opened up at least two types of interpretation in the later reading of Proverbs.Study of the utilising of Proverbs in later years in Sirach and 4QInstruction indicates two different directions.As will be shown, Ben Sira mainly followed the literal meaning of wisdom and poverty.4QInstruction, on the other hand, followed ta metaphorical use of the book, developing it into a theology of the poor.Under totally different circumstances and under the influence of other literature (inter alia apocalyptic literature) different visions were held on poverty.

C SIRACH 1 Provenance of Sirach
This work 65 was originally written in Hebrew between 195 and 175 BCE. 66ira's grandson started translating it into Greek after 132 BCE, 67 and finalised the work around 117 BCE. 68The book reflects the social world of the third century BCE Judea, a "period dominated by Hellenism." 69The book is "a codified reflection of the social and religious situation in Palestine" 70 of that time.
Ben Sira and his students belonged to the retainer class. 71He regarded himself as a scribe or a sage, and a wisdom teacher.His life stood in contrast to that of manual labourers.However, his efforts were "essential for the well-being of the community." 72As scribal sage he was a member of the "retainers with scribal, legal, cultural and religious functions, some of which may have overlapped with those of the priest." 73n Sira regarded his status as superior to that of day labourers, farmers and ordinary craftsmen (cf.Sir 38:24-34).His attitude towards the "non-scribal classes" 74 was patronising.Ben Sira's message to those below him on the social ladder was "mixed." 75On the other hand, the retainer class was employed by the rich.Ben Sira and his fellow sages relied upon them for a livelihood.Ben Sira therefore had to perform a "delicate balancing act." 76The "betwixt-and betweenness" 77 of his social position meant he could not criticise the rich too bluntly, but could not neglect to voice the rights of the poor.He had to steer between the relationships of rich and poor.Although he cannot provide a final solution for the differences between the poor and the rich (Sir 13:1-23), he aims at showing a way for some relationship. 78He had to warn the rich and powerful against exploiting the poor, but simultaneously promoted almsgiving to the poor and helping one in need.This made him a mediator between the rich and the ordinary Jew.According to Wright & Camp this ambivalence made him sensitive to his social status and the "theologically elevated view of his profession." 79This brought about some otherness in Sira's work.
According to Wright & Camp "riches and poverty are not metaphorical concepts" 87 in the book of Sirach.His discourse on these concepts is "derived from the real-life circumstances of third-and second-century BCE Jerusalem." 88When the book of Sirach talks of rich and poor "he talks almost exclusively in terms of people who do or do not have material wealth." 89irach 4 warns not to cheat the poor of their living. 90In 17:22 it is stated that "almsgiving is like a signet ring with the Lord."Sirach's understanding of wealth and poverty can be summarised with 40:26 ("Riches are good, but the fear of the Lord is better than either," NRSV) and 13:24 ("Riches are good if they are free from sin," NRSV).Although wealth is "socially higher than poverty," 91 it is quite important for Ben Sira what the affluent person does with his wealth. 92Wealth can easily lead to injustice, violence and crime.Wealth should rather be used for providing surety, giving alms and upholding the cult. 93In the short poem of Sir 29:8-13 almsgiving is proposed for the commandment's sake (cf.Deut 15:7-11).Sirach is realistic and never indicates that being poor is being pious. 94ra does not view poverty as a "guilty, self-induced situation." 95It is rather the "outcome of fate, idleness, unfavourable circumstances in life, and robbery by the rich people." 96Sirach advises people in this position to remain faithful to God and never give up hope. 97Some time or another God will reward those who are faithful to him even if they are poor.The poor do have "some special place in God's eyes." 98Although God is impartial, He is just and does listen to the prayer of the oppressed.

Sirach and Proverbs
In certain respects, Sirach's view is congruent to that of Proverbs.Sirach definitely harks back to the Book of Proverbs. 99Both Proverbs and Sirach "take the form of a manual designed to guide young men and women in behavior." 100hese handbooks teach learners how to instil the inherited values of the sages and to avoid stupid actions.Both may be "classed as scribal wisdom." 101milar literary forms 102 and themes are found in both.Both Sirach and Proverbs close with an acrostic poem in which they depict a personified wisdom (Prov 31:10-31; Sir 51:13-30).Numerical sayings are found in both (Prov 30:15b-16, 21-23; Sir 25:1-2; 26:5-6).With regard to poverty both Proverbs and Sirach recommend benevolence for those who are poor and in need. 103Ben Sira also links righteousness to giving alms to the poor. 104Sirach also comes to the conclusion that "poverty is a desolate, unenviable state." 105irach also advises the reader to avoid corruption in financial affairs.
In Sir 4 the "Jahrhunderte älteren Teilen des Sprichwörtebuches" (centuries older sections of the proverbs collection) 106 are reflected.Corley remarks that there is a "complexity and subtlety" 107 in Sirach's use of literature from Proverbs.Corley assumes that Ben Sira "had access to the Hebrew text of Proverbs." 108According to Corley Sirach not only alludes to Proverbs, but rather uses key words with which he plays, applying them to a different context without using "extensive verbatim quotations." 109Corley finds similarities between Proverbs and Sirach in three areas: theology, social ethics, and formal structure. 110He investigates these as: "theological similarities," 111 "similarities in the area of social ethics," 112 and "similarities of structure and form." 113umerical sayings occur in all three.While these subjects are dispersed in Proverbs, they are thematically 114 organised in Sirach. 115 concern, is Sirach's view as found in the section of social ethics.Sirach also links the expression of poverty to the language of honour and shame.While the topic of honour and shame is dealt with in different sections of Proverbs, Ben Sirach's ideas on this theme is found in several poems (Sir 4:20-22; 10:19-11:6; 201:21-26; 41:16-42:8; 42:9-14. 116Avoiding shame is "more prominent in Ben Sira" 117 than in Proverbs.Sirach also refers to the expression "fear of the Lord" (Prov 1:7; 9:10).Buttigieg indicates fear of God as the book's "overall theme (Gesamtthema)." 118Asensio also sees this theologumenon as the "nuclear theme" 119 in Sirach.In Sirach "fear" plays a larger role than merely conveying piety. 120Sirach "expands this so that to fear the Lord is also wisdom's fullness, garland, and root (Sir 1:14, 16, 18, 20)." 121 However, there are also some differences between Proverbs and Sirach.Sirach "adapts much of the content in Proverbs." 122Sirach lacks the comfort level of the Proverb sages, and "their confidence in the observable moral order of the world and their place in it." 123Proverbs is also "much more wedded to a theologized logic of material retribution than is Ben Sira." 124 In his probable third century BCE situation Sirach "is unable to maintain the consequential relationship of righteousness and wealth found in Proverbs." 125Other Sources for Sirach According to Adams, Ben Sira followed "longstanding modes of discourse." 126uttigieg also states that Ben Sira "also derived material from gentile sources." 127According to Buttigieg "there are perhaps about a hundred texts in Sirach that have clear parallels in Greek literature." 128Egyptian influences can also be detected in Sirach.Sirach reflects "Homer in 14:18 and the Greek poet Theognis elsewhere." 129Another example is the sayings of the "Demotic Egyptian "Instruction" of the sage Phibis (or Phebor) … as preserved in Papyrus Insinger." 130Ben Sira incorporates the Torah in his work, 131 but rejects mantic wisdom. 132Wright 133 identifies three sources for Sira: 134 Torah, the oral tradition of the sages, and "observation of the natural world."According to Adams 135 "the bulk of the instruction stands in the tradition of Proverbs and other ancient Near Eastern texts." 136The emphasis lies on the sharing and internalising of maxims.The Israelite literary tradition, therefore, is not the only source of Ben Sira.There are several sources.Corley refers to "other influences (Hebrew, Greek, and Egyptian) that caused Ben Sira to develop the 125 Wright and Camp, "Who Has Been Tested?" 173. 126Adams, "Rethinking," 578. 127Buttigieg, "Ben Sira," 4. 128 Buttigieg, "Ben Sira," 4 129 Buttigieg, "Ben Sira," 4 130 Buttigieg, "Ben Sira," 4. In this publication Buttigieg indicates the study of ancient Jewish quotations in Sira as a future field of research. 131A well-known example is found in Sir 24:1-22 where Wisdom in the form of personified Torah is linked to the temple in Jerusalem. 132Cf.Adams, "Rethinking," 578. 133Benjamin G. Wright, III, "Biblical Interpretation in the Book of Ben Sira," in A Companion to Biblical Interpretation in Early Judaism, ed.Matthias Henze (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 2012), 367. 134The same sources are indicated in Benjamin G. Wright, III, "The Use and Interpretations of Biblical Tradition in Ben Sira's Praise of the Ancestors," in Studies in the Book of Ben Sira: Papers of the Third International Congress on the Deuterocanonical Book, Shome'on Centre, Papa, Hungary, 18-22 May, 2006, ed.Geza G. Xeravits and Joszef Zsengeller (Leiden: Brill, 2008).He states on p. 184 "the traditional scribal wisdom that Ben Sira learned and then taught undoubtedly has a significant oral component, a few places in his book suggest that at least what he calls "Torah" is not always somebody of oral teaching, but it actually involves some written/ textual preservation of the law of God." 135 Adams, "Rethinking," 578. 136Cf.Wright, "Biblical Interpretation," 382.teaching that he found in Proverbs." 137With regard to Sir 24 Corley sees 138 influence "beyond Proverbs 8 to encompass other books of the HB (and doubtless non-biblical material) …" 139 In Sir 36 and 39 prophetic elements are woven into Sirach's words.Ben Sira probably had "the biblical commandments in front of him" 140 encouraging care for the poor and the oppressed.In Sir 11:17 the sceptical wisdom of Qohelet is reflected "in the first half of the verse and Proverbs' theological optimism in the second half." 141While the theme of poverty initially was a "Randthema" (marginal theme) 142 in the wisdom literature of Proverbs, Job and Qoheleth, it became increasingly important and is now found mainly in Sirach ("vor allem in Sir wesentlich häufiger vorkommen"). 143According to Corley Sir 3:30 develops Prov 16:6 "along the lines of Tobit 12:9 and the Septuagint of Daniel 4:27." 144 He links atoning value to almsgiving.In line with Prov 26:3 he advises to treat stubborn slaves harshly.Slaves are not to be enclosed with those who are to be taken care for. 145This is in line with Papyrus Insinger 14:6-11 that advises to beat those who are inferior. 146dentical to the final canonical form 149 of the Torah (Law) and Nebiim (Prophets) as we know it today, or just a collection still in process, is not clear.Wright therefore avoids the question whether the sources Ben Sira used can be called canonical or just scripture.According to Wright Ben Sira was rather "scripture conscious," 150 than "canonical conscious." 151Ben Sira stands in line with traditional wisdom teachers like those who produced Proverbs and Job, but "now looks to the Israelite literary heritage for inquiring into wisdom." 152Ben Sira is concerned with traditions of all kinds (the wisdom of the ancients, prophecies, the sayings of the famous, subtle and obscure parables, proverbs with hidden meanings, cf.Sir 39:1-3).According to Wright, when Ben Sira used various sources, he "manipulates, transforms, and otherwise shapes them to fit his own agenda." 153By interpreting 154 these sources he created a "figured world" 155 and depicted his view of the world and the role his students are to play in it as a pedagogical strategy.Ben Sira clearly tried to co-opt these sources in creating this "world." 156orley 159 identifies different areas of resemblance between Proverbs and Sirach.Generally, the concept of honour and shame plays a larger role in Sirach than in Proverbs.Sirach's presentation of these topics is also more systematic than that of the variegated collection of Proverbs.The two forms of scribal wisdom also differ from each other.Ben Sira not only re-contextualises the saying of Proverbs in a second century BCE framework, he also sets his teaching in a much broader intertextual structure.He complements his ideas with the cognitive content found in the biblical Law and Prophets, as well as those in other contemporary Near Ancient texts.Quoting, alluding and referring to them, he creates a "figured world" 160 around the wisdom theme.Poverty functions within this "intertextual connections" 161 in Sirach.With regard to the phenomenon of poverty the wisdom oriented literature in Sirach evolved into a more literary application of the material found in Proverbs and elsewhere.

D 4QINSTRUCTION 1 The Provenance of the So-Called 4QInstruction
It is quite difficult to pinpoint the provenance of 4QInstruction.Searching for a background "one frequent move is to compare 4QInstruction with Ben Sira and to situate it within the same timeframe, in the early part of the second century B.C.E." 162 Some argue that they overlap and that there was a dialogue between the two sapiential works 163 localising both in the pre-Maccabean era. 164Adams concedes that "there are enough parallels to demonstrate certain mutual interests and roughly similar periods of composition." 165They share a "pedagogical ethos" 166 and a pedagogical setting.Both try to infuse a love for learning in their students. 167In subject matter, much of 4QInstruction "resonates" 168 with the wisdom tradition also found in Proverbs.A common application of the Genesis creation stories is found in both.The commonalities between them can indeed help us to "identify important developments in the Second Temple wisdom tradition." 169

2
A New Direction for Wisdom Literature 4QInstruction has material that is alien to the traditional biblical wisdom found in Proverbs.No specific context is provided in the text of 4QInstruction.When it refers to a social context, it is so general that it can fit any context. 170Both have "disparate viewpoints, generic conventions, and audiences." 171They differ on issues like "the acquisition of knowledge, eschatology, and the acceptability of speculative wisdom." 172Adams would rather choose for a later date for 4QInstruction.There was a diversity of wisdom opinions during the period of the Second Temple (516 BCE-70 CE) and texts do not necessarily have to come from the same time.As far as vocabulary is concerned, 4QInstruction has anyway more in common with other Dead Sea Scrolls than with Sira and Biblical literature. 173e most obvious difference pertains to apocalyptic literature.The traditional assumptions of wisdom literature are now recontextualised in 4QInstruction "in light of the heavenly and temporal realities in a manner familiar to us from apocalyptic literature." 174Sirach and 4QInstruction "diverge radically on eschatology and divine retribution." 175In 4QInstruction a fortunate afterlife is promised to the learner.Sira "vehemently dismisses this possibility." 176Sirach is totally disinterested in any eschatology and rejects it.It "does not incorporate apocalyptic eschatology in his traditional advice." 177hile 4QInstruction has "a developed framework for eschatological judgement," 178 Sirach does not accommodate an afterlife in its teachings.4QInstruction "combines the eudemonistic and educational ethos of traditional wisdom with an apocalyptic worldview." 1794QInstruction also differs from most other wisdom texts because it puts the standard wisdom advice in a cosmological and eschatological context. 180 Sirach the priestly authorities are needed to pursue a scribal profession. 181Those in 4QInstruction do not deal with priestly matters whatsoever.4QInstruction rather deals with "individuals more on the margin of society who would not have to come into regular contact with such persons." 182he addressees are also totally different.Ben Sira's students belong to the retainer class.They are trained to become officials in the community in the capacity of judges, councilors and scholars. 183The addressees in 4QInstruction are not destined to become leaders in public.Their socio-economic background is totally different, even including women.The addressees of 4QInstruction are rather those who have to struggle with the problem of poverty.Reference to wealth is never found in 4QInstruction.Unlike Sirach that deals with wealth, this work concentrates much more on poverty. 184The learners in 4QInstruction are advised how to deal with issues like debt, standing surety for another and how to deal with deprivation.While Sirach emphasises the importance to his students of caring for the poor, the addressees in 4QInstruction are the poor themselves. 185While Sirach has the larger society in mind, 4QInstruction addresses those on the margin who are poor. 186

3
The Poverty of the Maven One of the "consistent emphases of 4QInstruction" 187 is on the poverty of the learner.It seems to be "something of a preoccupation of 4Qinstruction." 188The "maven" (addressee, learner 189 ) is repeatedly 190 reminded, "You are poor."Scholars interpret "poor" in different ways.It usually denotes the low status of the learner.The question for Adams 191 is whether one should "take the frequent poverty language in the text literally or figuratively." 192Wright sees no other way than to read this term as "reflections of social realities." 193Adams also sees this term as pointing at "a situation of real poverty for many recipients of the advice." 194Although this term is unique in Second Temple instructions, the "acute circumstances for the audience of 4QInstruction makes any financial advice even more important." 195Wright even asks if "poverty constitutes an ideal value for 4Qinstruction." 196Does "the sage of 4QInstruction prefers a way of life characterized by poverty"? 197e idea of poverty has both a literal as well as a metaphorical meaning in 4QInstruction.The addressees experienced real poverty in several forms.However, what 4QInstruction does, is to present a theological construct to help the addressees to cope with their circumstances.Hoppe is of opinion that this term in 4QInstruction deals with historical, political and economic matters, but also serves as "metaphor for another reality." 198It is simultaneously a metaphor for a theological construct.This is presented in 4QInstruction in the form of a Motivkonstellation (construct of motifs) of four interlinked terms: poverty, elected status, inheritance and raz nihyeh (the secret to be). 199e concept of poverty in 4QInstruction operates within a four-corner heuristic model.This model can mainly be found in 4Q416 2 III lines 5-19. 200he Hebrew term "raz nihyeh" (the mystery that is to be) 201 is the most often used term in 4QInstruction.It is found thirty-five times in the extant manuscripts of 4QInstruction.This concept forms the "core of 4QInstruction" 202 and is "the main tool" 203 for obtaining wisdom.The mebin (learner) is urged to constantly study this mystery.This mystery teaches him the way God has ordered the world.The learner is assured that God gave him glory and part in his plans.He will inherit eternal life.Although being poor at the moment, this rich inheritance is promised to him in the life hereafter.
The mebin (learner) is assured that he also has an elect God has set him with the nobles (i.e. the angels).He shares the final allotment of the heavenly beings.Although suffering some form of poverty at the moment, he will share in eternal glory.He can view himself as "chosen and therefore privy to the deeper understanding of things," 204 as revealed in this raz nihyeh he studies.
The learner inherited something that "is superior to monetary wealth." 205eing elected, knowing God's secrets, assured of his inheritance, he is now able to maintain his "dignity and sense of well-worth, while in a difficult situation of indebtedness." 206He may be literally poor, but can live in a dignified way as member of God's plans for the world.

Summary of 4QInstruction
It is not possible to identify the exact provenance of 4QInstruction.It recalls older teachings of wisdom and shares a "pedagogical ethos" 207 with Sirach.However, it differs radically with Sirach because of its apocalyptic worldview.While Sirach addresses future scribes of the retainer class, 4QInstruction communicates with those in the margin.The mebin (learner) is reminded again and again that he is poor.Sirach's pupils are to take care of those in destitution, the learners in 4QInstruction are literally the poor themselves.But the concept of poor has an additional metaphorical and ideological meaning in 4QInstruction.The concept of poverty is presented in a Motivkonstellation (constellation of motifs), a theological construct which proclaims that the poor are God's elected, although being poor at the moment.They have an eternal inheritance with the angels and already enjoy heavenly status, being part of God's raz nihyeh (the secret to be) design.

E SUMMARY
Proverbs, Sirach and 4QInstruction have a "family resemblance" 208 internally as well as externally.They present a dynamic continuity as well as a discontinuity in wisdom thinking.Each gave its own nuances to the of poverty.As a variegated collection of sayings Proverbs shows an ambivalent attitude towards the poor.In a constellation of different sapiential perspectives the elite warn the learner to look after the poor.The "poor" mostly has a literal sense, but also in some cases a figurative meaning.Ben Sira later on took up this term literally, while 4QInstruction developed it into a theological scheme.
Ben Sira contextualised the ideas in Proverbs in a second century BCE social and literal framework.Standing in a middle position between the common people and the elite, Ben Sira urged his learners to take care for the poor.Resemblance exists in different areas between Proverbs and Sirach.However, Sirach sets the material acquired from Proverbs and other literature from the ANE in the setting of a sapiential world of its own making.4QInstruction forms part of the Dead Sea scrolls.It is not really possible at this stage of research to identify its real provenance.It shares the didactic ethics of Proverbs and Sirach, but differs radically from them with its apocalyptic worldview.4QInstruction promises the really poor a heavenly inheritance.In a Motivkonstellation (constellation of motifs) it presents a theological construct of four interrelated terms (poor, elected, inheritance, and the secretto-be).4Qinstruction therefore develops an additional metaphorical and ideological meaning of "poverty." Poverty becomes the distinguishing mark here of the mebin assuring him or her of an eternal inheritance, privileged status and glory.

13 6
Benjamin G. Wright, III, "The Categories of Rich and Poor in the Qumran Sapiential Literature," in Sapiential Perspectives: Wisdom Literature in the Light of the Dead Sea Scrolls: Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium of the Orion Center, 20-22 May 2001, ed.John J. Collins, Gregory E. Sterling and Ruth Clements (Leiden: Brill 2004), 101.Ambivalence Regarding the Poor 10