Optimization of shift cycles in the South African mining sector

Increased depths of conventional gold and platinum mines, longer travelling times as working places move further from the shaft, and ancillary activities taking place in the mining cycle reduce the useable time spent at the workface. Current shift lengths of 8 hours 20 minutes may no longer be adequate to complete required mining activities.The impact of mineworker commuting times on shift work is also not well understood. The aim of this research was to draft a framework to optimize shift cycles in order to maximize productivity, health, safety, and wellness in the South African mining sector. The framework was informed by a review of the literature, case studies at a local gold mine and platinum mine, and a workshop with industry experts. The findings indicate potential advantages of extended shift lengths and continuous operations, such as improved productivity, asset utilization, and employee morale. However, concerns included fatigue and the associated safety hazards, particularly when working longer shifts, night shifts, and numerous consecutive shifts. Job demands, personal factors, and commuting times are further considerations when scheduling shifts. The ideal shift system for the mining sector should holistically consider and balance operational requirements, health and safety, and employees’ and their families’ requirements, and suit the unique needs of each operation. Changes in shift cycles will require a structured change management process, which involves all stakeholders, and could help to enhance the viability of the South African mining sector.


Introduction
The productivity of most conventional South African underground gold and platinum mines is declining, operational costs are increasing, and profit margins are shrinking, while health, safety, social, and environmental challenges are present (Neingo and Tholana, 2016;Singh, 2017). Many narrow-reef gold and platinum mines in the country are increasing in depth to reach new deposits, resulting in longer travelling times, rising costs, reduced profits, and heightened risks (Deloitte, 2014;Jacobs and Webber-Youngman, 2017;Minerals Council South Africa, 2018;Rupprecht, 2018a;Singh, 2017). The increased travelling times, along with additional ancillary activities taking place in the mining cycle, reduce time spent at the workface, and might hinder the attainment of a daily conformant blast (Gumbie, 2018). Previous research has indicated that mandatory shift lengths of 8 hours 20 minutes may no longer be adequate to complete the required mining activities (Rupprecht, 2018b). Increased shift lengths and the adoption of close-to-continuous operations (CONOPs) could help to address these challenges (Lazare, 2013). Factors affecting occupational health and safety (OHS) and worker wellbeing also need to be considered in relation to shift work. For example, the effects of worker travelling times from home to the stope face and the impacts of working conditions on worker fatigue are not well understood (Gumbie, 2018).
The purpose of the project was to draft a framework to assist mines to optimize shift cycles in order to maximize productivity, OHS performance, and employee wellness. The research assessed potential challenges in different activities in relation to on available face time, and feasible alternative shift cycles in the South African mining industry. Additionally, we examined the effects of commuting times, particularly regarding fatigue. The project was informed by a review of the literature, two case studies conducted in the South African mining industry, and a workshop with technical experts. The

Shift work
Shift work is required in many industries, including mining, and allows for longer hours of operation (Baulk et al., 2009). Shift work refers to 'an organisation of work where workers succeed each other at the same workplace while performing similar operations at different times of the day thus allowing longer hours of operation than feasible for a single worker' (Department of Mineral Resources, 2014, p. 36). Continuous shift work refers to operations that run 24 hours per day, seven days per week, throughout the year (Department of Labour, 1998). For this research, the terms 'continuous operations' (CONOPS) and 'full calendar operations' (FULCO) are used interchangeably. Numerous shift cycles are used in industry, and typically involve three 8-hour shifts or two 12-hour shifts, while some mines in South Africa operate two 10-, 10.5-, or 11-hour shifts (Baulk et al., 2009;Theron, 2014).
Conflicting findings regarding the pros and cons of different shift lengths are evident in the literature and are likely contextdependent. However, potential advantages of extended (e.g. 12hour) shift lengths might include improved productivity, better asset utilization, improved communication at shift changeovers, reduced sick leave, and improved employee morale (Baker, Heiler, and Ferguson, 2003;Stenzel, 2002). The use of 12-hour shifts results in compressed working weeks, which allows for longer periods of time off for social and domestic interaction and leisure, and a reduction in total commuting time (Baulk et al., 2009). Meanwhile, disadvantages of extended shifts could include fatigue, impaired performance, and increased rate of incidents (Baker, Heiler, and Ferguson, 2003;Bates, 2009;Baulk et al., 2009;Spencer, Robertson, and Folkard, 2006). As such, shift cycles should be designed to minimize fatigue, optimize productivity and OHS performance, and improve mine viability (Ngobese, 2017;Pickering, du Plessis, and Annandale, 2010;Smith et al., 1998;Stenzel, 2002).

Legal requirements and guidelines
Shift work and working hours are subject to regulations. Key pieces of legislation covering shift rostering at mining operations in South Africa include the following. Employers are required to evaluate work schedules to ensure that the health and safety of employees will not be at risk. The MHSA No. 29 of 1996 and OHSA No. 85 of 1993 require employers to conduct a risk assessment, implement measures to eliminate or control identified hazards, conduct medical surveillance concerning those hazards for employees, and train and inform employees about the risks and controls. The BCEA No. 75 of 1997 considers factors such as ordinary hours of work, overtime, compressed working weeks, averaging the hours of work, meal intervals, daily and weekly rest periods, and pay for work on Sundays, night work and public holidays. Exemptions in terms of collective agreements can be provided, subject to provisions.
The Code of Good Practice on the Arrangement of Working Time relates to shift work, night work, and rest periods during working time, and provides information about the impact of working time arrangements on the health, safety, and family responsibilities of employees (Department of Labour, 1997Labour, , 1998

Fatigue and other impacts of shift cycles on people
Shift work is associated with disturbed sleep, fatigue, reduced alertness and performance, occupational accidents and incidents, health problems, negative effects on social and domestic activities, and impaired mood (Baulk et al., 2009;Greubel et al., 2016;Härmä et al., 2018;Kalmbach et al., 2018). These risks could lead to economic losses resulting from increased sick leave and staff turnover rates (Greubel et al., 2016;Jacobsen and Fjeldbraaten, 2018). Absenteeism has been attributed to lengthy work hours, fatigue resulting from shift length and/or environmental conditions in the stope, and commuting to and from home (Rupprecht, 2018b).
Shift work, or work performed at unusual times, results in misalignment of the circadian rhythm (or 'body clock') with activities and sleep schedules, which contributes to fatigue or sleepiness at work (Department of Mineral Resources, 2014; Greubel et al., 2016;Kalmbach et al., 2018;Schutte, 2010a). Shift cycle characteristics that are associated with the risk of fatigue and incidents include the time of day, direction and speed of shift rotation, consecutive hours on duty, number of consecutive shifts, breaks between work periods, and rest breaks during work. In particular, factors associated with higher risk of fatigue and accidents include early morning or night shift work, backward rotating shifts, long shift durations (e.g. 12-hour shifts), too many consecutive shifts, a lack of rest breaks, and excessive overtime and on-call work (Bates, 2009;Department of Mineral Resources, 2014;Greubel et al., 2016;Härmä et al., 2018;Kalmbach et al., 2018;Spencer, Robertson, and Folkard, 2006;Theron, 2014).
As a result of these circadian and sleep disruptions, fatigue is an inherent hazard in shift work and is a causal or contributing factor in many occupational incidents in the mining industry (Hodgskiss et al., 2015;Pelders and Nelson, 2019;Schutte, 2010a;Theron, 2014). Fatigue results in reduced performance and productivity, impaired alertness, increased error rates, and can also result in medical and psychological problems such as heart disease, hypertension, diabetes, digestive problems, anxiety and depression (Bates, 2009;Department of Mineral Resources, 2014;Pelders and Nelson, 2019;Pfeifer, 2017;Schutte, 2010a;Theron, 2014). Numerous factors can contribute to fatigue in addition to shift work, including the job demands (e.g. stress), work environment (e.g. lighting, heat, and humidity), medical  Pelders and Nelson, 2019;Schutte, 2010a;Theron, 2014). Work factors associated with high risk of fatigue and accidents during shift work include heavy physical work, sustained effort, complex tasks, critical monitoring tasks, or repetitive and monotonous tasks (Baulk et al., 2009;Department of Labour, 1997;Department of Mineral Resources, 2014). Temperature extremes, excessive noise, work stress, poor ergonomic design of workstations and equipment, and long walking distances in underground workplaces can also contribute to fatigue (Department of Mineral Resources, 2014;Hodgskiss et al., 2015;Neingo and Tholana, 2016).
Lifestyle factors, such as activities outside of work and family commitments, poor diet or nutrition, a lack of exercise, as well as drug and alcohol abuse, can also contribute to fatigue (Hodgskiss et al., 2015;Pelders and Nelson, 2019;Department of Mineral Resources, 2014;Theron, 2014). Shift work can prevent workers from completing personal chores and can result in desynchronization with social participation and increased risk of poor work-life balance (Brown et al., 2010;Greubel et al., 2016;Rupprecht, 2018b). Additionally, factors such as sleep routines, maintaining healthy diets, and exercise and recreational activities can affect how employees adapt to shift work (Department of Labour, 1998;Department of Mineral Resources, 2014).
Commuting times, including time to travel from home to the mine and back again, and month-end travelling to and from labour-sending areas, can have an impact on health, safety, absenteeism, and fatigue outcomes (Brovko et al., 2018;Pfeifer, 2017;Rupprecht, 2018b;Sanqu, 2016). Workers with longer commutes have been shown to obtain less sleep during the work week, report higher levels of sleepiness, be less productive at work, and have significantly higher absenteeism rates (Hodgskiss et al, 2015;Pfeifer, 2017;van Ommeren and Gutierrez-i-Puigarnau, 2009). Theron (2014), for example, noted that mine employees' days commonly start at 3 am to catch public transport in order to start work at 6 am, and that they might only return home around 5 pm. These commutes limit the time available for workers to attend to household responsibilities and to sleep (Hodgskiss et al., 2015;Pelders and Nelson, 2019;Theron, 2014). Previous research conducted across eight operations in the South African mining industry revealed that over half of the sample of 875 participating mineworkers usually obtained less than 6 hours of sleep in the 24 hours before a work shift, and 31% reported having occasionally fallen asleep at work (Hodgskiss et al., 2015). Although this sample was not fully representative of the South African mining industry, it incorporated participants from the gold, platinum, coal, diamond, and manganese sectors and was considered to provide a basic indication of the levels of sleep obtained and fatigue among mineworkers in South Africa.

Productivity and operational requirements
Over the past few years, productivity in narrow-reef hard-rock underground gold and platinum group metal (PGM) mines has been declining due to a number of reasons, including additional safety requirements (e.g. nets), labour unrest, greater mining depth, and increasing working distance from the shaft. Most narrow-reef hard-rock underground gold and PGM mines utilize labour-intensive conventional drill-and-blast mining methods, requiring a re-entry period of between one and four hours after blasting prior to commencement of the subsequent shift (Brake, 2015). The literature study revealed that the standard current shift length of 8 hours 20 minutes is no longer adequate to complete most of the mining tasks in a single shift at most conventional underground mines (Lazare, 2013;Rupprecht, 2018b). The available face time is increasingly becoming marginal due to a number of factors such as increasing travelling times as mines are getting deeper and working faces are progressing further from existing shafts, unauthorized breaks due to lack of discipline, early work stoppages and late shift starts due to activities such as meetings, safety talks, early entry examinations, and risk assessments (Neingo and Tholana, 2016). Other factors that affect labour productivity include prevailing working environmental conditions (such as temperature, humidity, and stoping width), equipment availability, competence and skills of the workforce, workforce efficiency, workforce availability and work ethic within the workforce (Aljuhani, 2002;Neingo and Tholana, 2016;Roussos, 1996).
Productivity in conventional underground gold and PGM mines could be improved through optimization of shift cycles, ensuring the availability of the right-sized workforce to complete all the required tasks within the allotted time (Lazare, 2013;Neingo and Cawood, 2014;Rupprecht, 2016 and2018b). In order to attain all planned conformant blasts, sufficient time should be allowed for travelling, execution and completion of work, and other ancillary tasks (Rupprecht et al., 2001). Timemotion studies conducted during the Sindisa project were used to identify major ancillary activities that caused delays in the mine production system (Table I). In order to attain an optimal mine production system, a systems thinking approach, aiming to optimize the shift cycles together with other components of system, should be adopted. The majority of the identified delays could be mitigated through good practices such as proper planning, good work organization, efficient communication strategies, and sound maintenance practices. Interventions that could be put in place to improve available face time include reduction of travelling times through efficient personnel transportation systems, longer shifts, and technology solutions to expedite completion of ancillary activities such as early entry examination, barring, support, and risk assessments (Rupprecht, 2016).
The Sindisa Gold project was initiated in 2011 by the Minerals Council South Africa (MCSA) in collaboration with mining companies and organized labour, to explore opportunities for optimizing utilization of mine assets. For the purpose of this article, mine assets include ore reserves, plant, equipment, and machinery. The Sindisa Gold project envisaged optimizing asset utilization through practices such as increasing the number of production days per annum, attaining more planned conformant blasts, and ensuring the availability of mineable ground (including a contingency) all the time (Lazare, 2013). Optimum utilization of labour was to be achieved by increasing the number of production days per annum through adoption of close-to-CONOPs, with shift lengths not exceeding 12 hours crush-tocrush (Lazare, 2013). Critical enablers of the process include co-creation of the shift cycles with all stakeholders (including the workforce), sufficient consultation and engagement witj all key stakeholders, and ensuring that the new shift schedules do not violate any legal requirements (Lazare, 2013

Methods
Two case studies were conducted at mine sites in South Africa.
Data was collected at one platinum mine and one gold mine in April and August 2019, respectively. These mines are not representative of the South African mining sector, but provide examples of aspects that are impacted by the design of shift schedules in the industry, in the local context. Convenience sampling was used to identify potential mine sites, with input and understanding from experts in the field, and the sites were selected based on permissions received to collect data. Data was collected from individuals at each mine who had an in-depth knowledge of the operation and access to required information, including human resources (HR), mine planning, and production personnel. This was a mixed methods study, as both qualitative and quantitative data was gathered. Qualitative data was obtained in interviews and focus group discussions held with the participants. The discussion guides included open-ended questions relating to shift cycles, ancillary activities, face time, travelling times, work conditions, resources, and fatigue. Quantitative data was provided by the mines. This data included the shift rosters and shaft schedules, planned versus actual bankto-bank times, productivity, health, and safety data, and shift activity durations, where available. The data was captured into an electronic format for analysis. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the qualitative data, and themes from the data were coded and summarized. Basic statistical analyses were conducted on quantitative data. Selected shift cycles were analysed using the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) Fatigue and Risk Index calculator. A framework for optimizing shift cycles in the South African mining industry was drafted, based on the results.
A workshop was held following data collection and analysis to present and discuss the findings from this project, and to gain technical input into the draft framework. The workshop was held at the Mandela Mining Precinct on 25 October 2019. The participants included representatives from mining companies, research partners, and the SAMERDI programme. Feedback received from the stakeholders was used to update and refine the draft framework, and to identify future research topics. Engagement with further stakeholders, including labour representatives, will be required before finalization of the shift cycle guidelines for industry.
Ethics approval for the project was granted by the CSIR Research Ethics Committee (reference number: 239/2017).

Case study 1
The participating platinum mine is located in the Bushveld Complex in Mpumalanga Province, South Africa. It operates underground at depths of between 50 m and 850 m, using low-profile mechanized board-and-pillar mining. The mine was classified as a 'hot' mine (wet bulb temperature: ≥27.5°C) (Schutte, 2010b), while the work performed was not considered labour-intensive. The mine operated continuously and, in general, the implementation of CONOPs at this mine was considered successful.
The mine operated seven days per week, throughout the year, except for certain public holidays and over the Christmas period. Two 10-hour production shifts operated each day, using a 5D 5N 5O roster (where D = day shift, N = night shift, and O = day off). The start and end times for the day and night shifts were 07h00 to 17h00 and 20h00 to 06h00, respectively. However, different documents from the mine showed discrepancies in the official shift start and end times. Other shift cycles that were used at the mine were 4D 4O 4N 4O shifts (e.g. for essential services and at the plant), and straight shifts, which operated from Monday to Friday, and only during the day. The mine had 341 production days per year. Employees on CONOPs worked an average of 243 shifts each per year. Maintenance took place in each level every two weeks during day shifts. During the 10-hour shifts worked by CONOPs employees, approximately 7 hours were spent at the workface. The average travelling time to the face was 30 to 40 minutes, but reached up to 2 hours depending on location in the operation. The longest travelling distance was approximately 2.5 km. The drilling time was approximately 2.5 hours per face. Two spare panels were available to allow for redundancy. Drilling, supporting, and cleaning could extend throughout the shift, as work could continue at another panel once one was completed. Two blasts per day were planned, and the re-entry period was approximately 1 hour. The overall rate of lost blasts for the year to date was 20%, with breakdowns, labour shortages, and service days among the causes.
An analysis was conducted of the number of hours that mining crews spent underground during the previous seven days. The average number of underground hours worked ranged from 6 hours 35 minutes to 8 hours 23 minutes. In general, the night shift underground hours were longer than the day shift hours. Results of face time studies conducted at the mine in 2011 were also assessed, for which average face times of around 7.5 hours were reported. In levels with the longest horizontal travel distances, differences between collar-to-collar and face times ranged from 49 to 98 minutes. Ancillary activities that workers conducted upon arriving at the mine included the collection of lamps and gas detection instruments; queuing for and travelling on chairlifts; walking to (and from) the waiting place; safety and waiting place meetings; and travelling to and from the workface.
The commuting distances for workers ranged from approximately 4 km to 70 km. Mine buses were available to transport workers to and from the surrounding communities. From an analysis of the pick-up and drop-off times of the mine buses, it was estimated that an employee with a commuting time of 1 hour between home and work, who works 10-hour shifts, had 11 hours available for personal activities and sleep during each workday. This time allowed for the additional half hour between transport arrival/departure and working times, but excluded the time between leaving home and arriving at the transport pick-up point and waiting for the transport to arrive.
The fatality frequency rate at the time of the assessment was 0.00 and the lost-time injury frequency rate was 0.5 (per 200 000 shifts worked). The average turnover rate at the mine was 0.5%, and a large portion of the workforce had been at the mine since the operation commenced. The absenteeism rate was considered by the mine management to be relatively low compared to other mines. The average rate of sick leave ranged from 3.5% to 4.5%, and the average annual and other leave ranged from 7% to 13.5% for the previous three months.

Case study 2
The second case study site was a fully mechanized gold mine in Gauteng Province, South Africa. The mine operated underground at depths of 3000 m. The average wet bulb temperature in the workplaces was 27.5°C. The mine used CONOPs arrangements. Changes to the shift systems at the mine had been made to improve productivity and to better suit current conditions. The changes involved extension of the shifts and reducing the number of consecutive shifts worked. Improvements in production, maintenance, and safety were reported as a result of the shift changes. However, the cited disadvantages were higher absenteeism and fatigue.
The mining production teams, and some engineering personnel, operated using 4×3 (or 4×4) shifts (4D 4O 4N 4O) that were 11.5 hours long. A maintenance shift was incorporated into this roster, such that three production shifts and one maintenance shift took place in the cycle. The reported clock-in and clock-out times for the day shift were 05h45 and 17h35, and 17h40 and 05h35 for the night shift. As with the other case study, slight discrepancies between shift times from different sources were evident, and it was not clear when employees were required to arrive at work versus when they clocked in at the shaft. Production could take place 351 days per year. An agreement was negotiated whereby workers would work for six of the 12 national public holidays and be off for the other six public holidays and over the Christmas break. It was noted that an increase in the number of non-production days could assist with maintenance at the mine. Mining employees each worked approximately 180 shifts per year, including training and leave, and around 107 days excluding training and leave days.
During the 11.5-hour shift, time spent at the face ranged from 8 to 11.5 hours, and incorporated at least two of the following activities: drilling (approx. 4.2 hours); charging and blasting (aprox. 2.5 hours); support (approx. 5.2 hours); and loading (approx. 3.4 hours). Two blasts were planned per day, but sometimes only one blast was possible. The re-entry period was around 1 hour and was relatively short because of the long travelling times and as the working place was not confined. The time taken for workers to travel from the lamp room to the workplace was approximately 1 hour. The horizontal travelling distances to the workplaces were up to 2 km, and the workers either walked or used trains to travel underground. Problems booked at the mine for the year to date were assessed, the majority of which related to support, and also included those relating to services and breakdowns. Contingency plans were in place in terms of labour, equipment, and power at the mine. Additional labour was planned for certain occupations in production. The planned contingency was around 15% per section, and an extra roving crew was available.
Most of the workers were reported to live within a 15 km radius of the mine. Workers used a range of transport modes to commute, including public transport, private vehicles, and mine buses (for those living in the mine hostel). The working hours were adjusted to accommodate for public transport availability. It was estimated that workers could spend approximately 10 hours at home on workdays, when accounting for working hours and commuting times. It was reported that some of the workers lived in informal housing (shacks), and the poor living conditions associated with this housing could contribute to fatigue. In addition to the long shifts worked, commuting times, and living conditions the high temperatures in the mine were a potential contributor to fatigue. Fatigue management programmes, processes, and training, wellness programmes, and mid-shift meal breaks were in place.
The fatality frequency rate was 0.00 and the lost-time injury rate was 1.20 for 2019 (at the time of the data collation), compared the rates from the previous year of 0.05 and 0.98, respectively. The absenteeism rate at the mine for all causes was 16% for the year to date, and was considered by mine management to be reasonable, compared to other mines. Absenteeism comprised approximately 43% annual leave, 24% training, 14% sick leave, 3% 'absent', and 16% 'other'.

Fatigue and risk indices
The HSE fatigue calculator was used to estimate and compare fatigue and incident/accident risk for different shift rosters. Three shift rosters were chosen as examples, and the results are shown in Figures 1 to 3. Fatigue and risk scores are provided for each shift within a schedule. The fatigue and risk indices are similar in many respects, but differences include time-of-day effects (e.g. accident risk tends to be higher close to midnight, while fatigue tends to peak in the early morning). The fatigue scores range from zero to 100 and indicate the percentage chance of experiencing high levels of sleepiness, such that the workers might struggle to stay awake during that shift. Meanwhile, the risk scores refer to the relative risk of an accident or incident, with a baseline value of 1.0.
The default scores of the index can be adjusted according to commuting times, job types, and job breaks components. For this analysis, the default scores were kept consistent, and were set at 1 hour commuting time, a moderately demanding workload, mostly continuous attention requirement, and rest breaks taken for 30 minutes after every 5.5 hours, and for 5 minutes every 2 hours. Changes in these components, and in shift start and end times, have significant impacts on the fatigue and incident risk scores. The tool is useful for assessing risks of fatigue and injury, but should not be relied on as the primary means of assessing these risks, and does not account for factors such as specific work-related issues, individual differences, or social factors that might affect workers' tolerance to shift work (HSE, 2019).
It is evident that the scores, particularly for fatigue, are higher during night shifts than during day shifts. Additionally, the fatigue and accident risks increase with the number of consecutive shifts worked. Meanwhile, the days off provide an opportunity for recovery in between shifts worked. If fatigue and accident risk scores do not return to the original values when the shift cycle is repeated, it indicates that workers do not have the opportunity to fully recover within the shift cycle. Higher fatigue and accident scores were evident for the rosters with longer shift lengths, while lowest risk scores were evident in the rosters that only incorporated day shifts.

Discussion and recommendations
The case studies provide examples of the successful implementation of CONOPs at mines in South Africa. The main benefit of CONOPs that was indicated was improved productivity (in terms of the number of tons produced per month), as the longer shifts helped to increase face times in relation to the total number of hours worked. This finding is in support of the literature on the topic; for example, Stenzel (2002) reported that the productivity of a certain mine increased by 21% after implementation of CONOPs with a 12-hour shift roster. Additionally, maintenance was improved, as service shifts were incorporated into the rosters. The use of contingency measures such as availability of spare panels and extra roving crews further aided continued production. However, potential challenges associated with longer shifts included increased fatigue and absenteeism. Other factors that were associated with fatigue and OHS outcomes during shift work included commuting times, living conditions, the provision of meal breaks and mid-shift meals, the workplace environmental conditions (e.g. heat), and job demands. Analysis of the fatigue and accident risks associated with selected rosters revealed that the risks were higher with longer shifts, during night shifts, and when numerous consecutive shifts were worked. The implementation of CONOPs might differ between the case study sites and conventional mining operations in some respects; however, the basic principles relating to the use of CONOPs could be applied to different types of mining operations. A draft framework was compiled based on the findings from the literature review and research conducted, and was discussed and amended based on feedback received from the technical workshop. The draft framework serves as a basis for further industry engagement and recommended research for the optimization of shift cycles in the South African mining industry. The framework includes numerous considerations and recommendations relating to shift cycle design, which are summarized in Table II.
It is evident that the ideal shift rostering system for the mining sector must holistically consider and balance operational requirements, employee needs, and OHS requirements. The assessment of shift cycles and fatigue should consider a number of factors, and be developed to suit the unique needs of each operation. Consultation between stakeholders, including mining companies and worker representatives, is important for the successful implementation of changes to shift cycles.
The development and implementation of new shift schedules will require a structured change management process and effective stakeholder engagement. For example, the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) model can be used to plan, develop, implement, and continually improve the new shift roster. This project links to work conducted in the Successful Application of Technology Centred Around People (SATCAP) programme, which aimed to identify appropriate change management and stakeholder engagement processes for shift cycles appropriate for mine modernization. The Mining Industry Occupational Safety and Health (MOSH) adoption process for leading practices could be used to facilitate the implementation of new shift schedules.
Recommendations for future research needs were identified during the project. Primarily, the need for involvement of further stakeholders, including representatives from a range of mines, labour representatives from each union, and government and community representatives, was emphasised for the finalization of guidelines for shift cycle optimization in the South African mining sector. Qualitative research involving mineworkers was recommended. In addition, participation from members involved with the Sindisa Gold Project was suggested to build on this work. Further research could involve additional analyses of the processes that have been used by mines when successfully implementing changes to shift cycles. Additional input relating to occupational medicine impacts of different shifts would be helpful to refine the shift cycle framework. An assessment of best and worst practices relating to shift cycles, and available monitoring systems and tools, would be valuable, along with the development of a toolbox for monitoring and evaluation of performance. Research involving the use of real-time information management and monitoring systems, such as smart watches, was also recommended. Further suggested work relates to reward systems or remuneration practices, the ageing workforce, resistance to change, and workplace culture in the modernizing South African mining industry. In addition, a systems approach, integrating work conducted within the LoCM and broader SAMERDI projects, is suggested, as many of the findings could be related for appropriate implementation in the mining sector.

Conclusion
Changes to shift cycles could help to enhance the viability of the South African mining sector. These changes could help to address challenges relating to increased travelling times, reduced face times, and impaired productivity, while addressing the impact of commuting times, personal factors, and worker fatigue in relation to shift work. This paper outlined several factors to consider when assessing shift cycle options. Operational and productivity requirements, OHS matters, and employee preferences need to be taken into account. Furthermore, stakeholder engagement and change processes need to be effectively managed. Additional research, involving a broader range of stakeholders, will assist in the completion of guidelines for shift cycle optimization in the South African mining sector.