Rethinking gender and conduits of control: A feminist review

ABSTRACT The South African Constitution has been hailed as one of the most progressive in the world and has received high acclaim internationally (Mkhwanazi 2016:6). However, the war on women, their bodies and their right to self-determination persists, irrespective of the Constitution. Literature reveals experiences of brutal rapes and killings of black lesbian women, as well as mistreatment and hate speech in the name of morality against sex workers, women seeking abortions and HIV-positive women (Strode et al. 2012:64). Based on a desktop review of images and audio-visuals of women's narratives in South Africa, this paper finds that many of the country's contemporary social institutions, such as the state, family, church and culture, amongst others, normalise forms of gendered violence, such as the policing, control and exploitation of women's lives and bodies through cultural practices like ukuthwala and ukuhlolwa kwobuntombi. Research findings also include narratives of women, who - in spite of prevailing social and institutionalised violence - have leveraged personal agency to declare autonomy and make personal choices regarding their bodies and lives. Keywords: gendered violence, LGBTI people, patriarchal societies, rape, ukuhlolwa kwobuntombi.


Introduction
We therefore, through our freely elected representatives, adopt this Constitution as the supreme law of the Republic so as to -Heal the divisions of the past and establish a society based on democratic values, social justice and fundamental human rights; Lay the foundations for a democratic and open society in which government is based on the will of the people and every citizen is equally protected by law (Constitution 1996:1).
South Africa boasts one of the most liberal and progressive constitutions in the world. It promotes and protects democratic values, social justice and fundamental human rights for every citizen, who is equally protected under the law. What is of relevance to this research is the Bill of Rights that precedes the Constitution, which stipulates that, [e]veryone has the right to bodily and psychological integrity, which includes the right-(a) to make decisions concerning reproduction; (b) to security in and control over their body (The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 1996:6).

The Bill of Rights affirms the values of dignity, equality and freedom for all South
African citizens (The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 1996:5-6). In section 9(2), the Constitution (1996:5) defines equality as including 'full enjoyment of human rights and freedoms', which means that human rights are not enough in themselves: freedom is also a necessity in ensuring equality. Our argument is that as long as some citizens are not free because of their gender and/or sexual orientation, equality remains a fallacy and a delusion. We are troubled by the fact that the promise of 'freedom and security of the person' (The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Matters) Amendment Act 32 of 2007, popularly known as the New Sexual Offenses Act of 2007. Amongst other advances, the Act expands the legal definition of rape to include all forms of sexual penetration without consent, irrespective of gender or sexual orientation. Later in this article, we explore how, despite these advances, the law still fails women, who are experiencing varied and multiple sexual and gender oppressions in South Africa.

Theoretical paradigm: Radical feminism
Radical feminist theory offers a holistic worldview for the experiences of LGBTI people, girls, and women involved in ukuthwala, 1 ukuhlolwa kwobuntombi 2 and polygamy in South Africa. This theory creates an original and social theory of women's oppression and strategies to end that oppression, which comes from women's lived experiences (Rowland & Klein 1996). Unlike other feminist theories, radical feminist theory is based on the premise that patriarchy is a system that is at the core of women's oppression and believes that women's oppression is best alleviated by the eradication of patriarchy entirely (Johnson 1997;Mkhize 2015).
Most African cultural practices, such as ukuthwala, ukuhlolwa kwobuntombi and polygamy, are socially constructed and based and premised on patriarchal discourses in which women and females -young or old -are viewed and treated as properties of culture and men. Such cultural possession and the control of female sexualities, behaviours and bodies lead to the objectification and oppression of women and girls, subjecting them to gendered violence and abuses. Patriarchal African cultures not only control sexualities and genders of women and girls, but also those of LGBTI people. Within this context of control, policing, objectification, and the violation of sexualities and genders, radical feminist theory attests that all females are oppressed, and that their oppression runs across all groupings by race, ethnicity and social class (Renzetti 2010). Feminist theorists note that some women accept this, but that not all oppressed people agree or accept that they are oppressed. We find radical feminism appropriate for our study because diverse women's experiences in South Africa are located within a patriarchal experience, which connects the personal and the political.
Radical feminist theory is useful in analysing how the Constitution and policies in a democratic South Africa are failing to address women's oppression in the area of gendered violence and harm.
We have also found postcolonial feminism to be relevant to our analysis in this article.
Postcolonial feminism seeks to understand women's experiences in relation to history, culture and society (Tyagi 2014 "colonial" power and its discourses that continue to shape various cultures, including those whose revolutions have overthrown formal ties to their colonial rulers. In addition to the oppression that cuts across all races, ethnicities and classes, the oppression of black African women, girls and LGBTI people seems to operate through a culturally specific oppression that promotes the abduction of young girls and women. That is, the control of female sexuality through ukuhlolwa kwobuntombi, the othering of LGBTI people -given that their genders and sexualities are viewed as 'unAfrican' (Tamale 2013:13) -and polygamy. Western feminism assumes that the female experience of oppression, violence, and reproductive health issues are universal (Mohanty 1984:334-335). Postcolonial feminists critique this essentialist view of women, which often does not acknowledge women's different identities and experiences (Mkhize 2012). Radical and postcolonial feminist thinking, then, allow for the critical analysis of colonialism, apartheid, democracy, and their effects on the lived experiences of girls, women and LGBTI people -their reproductive rights and general human rights (Anderson 2003:5).
Using these theories, the construction of identities and the oppression of women and girls are exposed. It is patently evident that South African women have different experiences because of their different races, ethnicities, locations, professions and religions. Further, concepts such as reproduction, the sexual division of labour, the family, the marriage household, and patriarchy, must be used in relation to their specific local, cultural and historical contexts (Mohanty 1984(Mohanty , 2007. With this in mind, we now examine South African gendered practices.

Social institutions and violence in South Africa
The state and the family Existing analyses on gendered violence in South Africa show that most individuals are more likely to be raped by a family member, relative, or an acquaintance, than by a stranger (Rape Crisis Centre [Sa]). This research reveals that more than 30 percent of women over the age of 18 have been raped (Rape Crisis Centre [Sa]).
This figure points to a lack of safety and protection for most females in South Africa. Research also confirms that one third of girls who graduate from high school have been raped (Faul 2013). This occurs within the context of "an average family life" for females (girls and women, whether heterosexual, bisexual, lesbian or transgender) in South Africa. Most African cultural and religious practices normalise such gendered violence by promoting male hegemony (Njawala 2016:32). The situation is exacerbated by the fact that most cultural and religious leaders are men, who reinforce gendered discourses within these institutions by promoting the rights of men above those of women. 4

Culture and religion
Culture and religion play significant roles in the lives of many South Africans. It is estimated that about 84.5 per cent of the South African population consider culture and religion to be important ( The depth of the crisis around gendered violence in South Africa is shown in the fact that a president can be accused of rape, successfully escape punishment, and then immediately be deemed a god of the nation. In addition, when the president is questioned on his polygynous practice, he always states that his culture allows him to have multiple wives. Polygyny is deemed a cultural norm in South Africa; yet polyandry -women with multiple husbands -is unheard of. Culture, it appears, legitimates different norms for men and for women. Moreover, young girls and women continue to go through Both ukuthwala and ukuhlolwa kwobuntombi are based on an understanding of female sexuality as symbolically troublesome, deviant, hyperactive and unruly, and hence needing to be policed. These practices cause female sexualities to be regulated, objectified and 'othered' under patriarchal social constructions of African sexualities (Tamale 2013:35). This contradicts the freedoms of individual autonomy, sexual rights and bodily integrity afforded to all citizens, which are foundational to the Constitution.
Despite this, the Children's Act of 2005 makes provision in Section 12 for virginity testing and forced marriages, allowing these practices among children between 16-18 years of age. Although female genital mutilation is prohibited in the Act, virginity testing promotes the policing and violation of female sexuality, as does female genital mutilation. Catherine Albertyn (2009:251) fiercely argues that virginity testing, amongst other harmful cultural practices against girls and women in South Africa, represents the stubbornness of patriarchy in cultural systems and must be abolished. Other scholars argue that virginity testing is a cultural concession to an act of gendered violence (see Behrens 2014, Chisale & Byrne 2018. Another form of gendered violence is the violent rapes -referred to as 'corrective rape' -meted out to lesbians, who are also often the victims of hate speech owing to their gender identity (Vilakazi 2014:12).
Manifestly, patriarchal social constructions of African cultural practices, such as ukuthwala, ukuhlolwa kwobuntombi and polygamy, along with their promotion of heteronormativity, which leads to the stereotyping of LGBTI people, not only police and control female sexuality as though it were the property of men and of culture, but also promote gendered violence. For example, young girls in forced marriages become rape victims when they are forced to have sex with their husbands, who are normally much older. In addition, they suffer unwanted pregnancies and STDs, including HIV/AIDS. Some young girls involved in virginity testing fall victim to men's desire when their virginity becomes known, leading to sexual abuse (Leclerc-Madlala 2001:555), and also resulting in forced marriages that expose them to abuse and harm, including rape and diseases.
LGBTI people, whose gender identities are seen as non-conforming and "rebellious", are similarly vulnerable to injurious practices such as corrective rape and other hate crimes stemming from homophobia.

Methodology: Qualitative desktop review
The data for this chapter was collected via a desktop review. This involved the collection of secondary data that contained narratives of the lived experiences of girls, women and LGBTI people, who are the focus of this study. We chose this research method as it is flexible and can be used in several ways when analysing historical material and various available secondary data concerning a particular topic or subject (Johnston 2014:55). Data was collected through reviewing books, journal articles, websites, video clips, news articles, local government policies, government publications and relevant documents on gendered oppression and violence (Kumar 2014). The method proved to be an effective process of inquiry into existing data on girls', women's and LGBTI people's narratives recounting their experiences of gendered violence. Regarding women, our research focused specifically on sex workers and women living with HIV/AIDS, including women seeking abortion services, whom we believed would be among the most vulnerable women in the country. Unlike face-toface interviews, which generate in-depth rich data, engaging in secondary data limited us not only to understanding already recorded experiences of gendered violence, but also allowed us to survey a wide range of narratives of gendered violence. We used qualitative content analysis (QCA) in analysing the data. QCA allowed us to identify and explore key theoretical challenges and themes, to test them, and then to qualify them in relation to the available data and findings of the research. The words above were spoken by Simon Nkoli at the inaugural lesbian and gay pride march in South Africa in 1990. This statement remains relevant for many lesbians in South Africa, but specifically for those in townships, who not only have to face oppression on the grounds of race, gender and sexual orientation, but also of class.
Despite the Constitution's prohibiting discrimination on the basis of gender and sexual orientation (amongst other forms), lesbians are still not allowed into the nation's most public spaces and are punished for their sexual orientation. Since the late 1990s, South Africa has witnessed hate crimes, 6 including countless numbers of black lesbians being violated, raped and/or brutally murdered in townships (Hlati 2018).
Even though these forms of sexual and gendered violence receive some media attention, they remain severely under-reported and under-investigated. The perpetrators of such crimes often intend to send a message or threat to a whole community. For instance, violence against lesbians in townships is intended to frighten the entire LGBTI community by making them afraid of similar attacks. Our research indicates that the narratives of most lesbian victims of gender-based violence assert that the attacker confirms harming them because of their sexual orientation and gender expression, with most of the lesbians being attacked and stereotyped as "butch".
Most of the survivors' narratives claim that they were attacked by people who are familiar to them. For example, Dikeledi Sibanda (2013) Cheryl Potgieter (2011)  and staying safe and are not concerned about issues of exploitation or objectification, as has been the focus of some critiques of sex work (Arnott 2006:89 tests are allegedly aimed at protecting young girls from early pregnancy and ensuring a good dowry for her family when the young girl gets married. The same applies to ukuthwala, a customary practice that forces young women into marriage. One young girl tells a story of how she was abducted at the age of 13 years and kept as a slave during her forced marriage whilst another woman recalls how she was abducted while taking a bath at home (Louw 2014). Everyone in her family knew that this was going to happen but neglected to inform her (Louw 2014).
Another young girl was kidnapped for the purpose of marriage as a result of a plot hatched by her mother and aunt. The girl narrated, 'I was 19 doing Grade 12. There was this old man. I say he was an old man because he was about 20 years older than me. He worked at a mine in Johannesburg' (Gontsana 2017:[Sp]). The young And that is complicated because the tubes were burned' (Strode, Mthembu & Essack 2012:64).
This case indicates the challenges in translating legal provisions into effective policies that should protect individuals from institutional violations. Human rights violations in health care settings impede access to HIV prevention, treatment, care and support.
Most narratives from women who have been forcibly sterilised demonstrate that health care providers failed to provide information that would enable the patients to make informed decisions. For instance, one woman stated that, 'I do not know anything, even what form of sterilization was performed' (Strode et al. 2012:64).
Another participant claimed, I was told to be sterilized. They said it was a simple procedure. Only when I went to the [operating] theatre did I begin to realize the seriousness of my situation.
They had not told me that I would be taken to a theatre (Strode et al. 2012:64).
In some instances, the procedure was not even mentioned, and the women only found out that they had been sterilised when they tried to have another baby. HIV are vulnerable to human rights violations. The practise of forced sterilisation is a violation of rights and adversely affects women's physical and mental health, as well as infringes the right of a woman to decide on the number and spacing of her children.
In 'She made up a choice for me' (Strode et al. 2012), participants who shared their experiences portray how their ability to make choices was taken away from them and placed in the hands of health care providers, who in turn took away control of their bodies. One participant mentioned, These testimonies give a clear indication that health care facilities, largely run by the state, believe that power over women's bodies is justified. Some critics go as far as to equate the practice of forced sterilisation to a form of institutionalised gender-based violence. The narrative of a participant whose tubes were burnt, making it impossible to reverse the procedure, shows the brutality of the process. History also tells us that forced sterilisations were performed on individuals with a lower social standing, including individuals with mental disabilities, people of colour, or anyone who was deemed incapable of raising a child (Stubblefield 2007:170).

Discussion
Our research reveals that women's oppression is rife in the South African context, despite progressive legislation. The control and policing of women's lives, bodies and sexualities by the law, tradition, culture and religion continue to be normalised and shape the practices and ideas about women's bodies and sexualities in various spheres. Gendered violence is structural, systemic and layered in various areas of women's lives. Our research further shows that most violence against women happen within the family. In the cases of ukuthwala and ukuhlolwa kwobuntombi, for instance, elderly women are used as tools to oppress young women's sexualities and bodies.
The narratives demonstrate the role of elderly women within families, who often act as virginity testers. In most of these scenarios, men and fathers act as custodians of tradition and culture and as beneficiaries, mostly through the bride price that is paid for a girl child who is found to be a virgin before marriage. These norms prescribe in many ways, through harmful cultural and religious practices, that a woman's body and sexuality are not her own, because they belong to another person. This may be her father, husband, boyfriend or lover/s. She is not allowed to own, claim and exercise power, freedom and autonomy over her body and life.
As a result, men continue to rape and kill women because they firmly believe that it is within their rights to subject women in that way, especially when women show signs of non-conformity, resistance, and attempts to retain control over their own

Conclusion
South Africa has good constitutional and legislative provisions in place regarding the protection of its citizens. It should be experienced as enabling freedom; ironically, it is not, particularly for women, girls, sex workers and LGBTI people. Our research reveals a country that remains deeply rooted in religious, traditional and cultural fundamentalisms. This research also shows that institutions such as the state, family, culture and religion, which exist in a stubborn and systemic patriarchal manner, are used in contemporary South Africa to subjugate girls', women's and lesbians' bodies and lives through harmful cultural and religious practices such as ukuthwala and virginity testing. This is also apparent in the manner in which women's sexualities and bodies are treated, handled, policed and engaged with. Even in practices that include legal protection, such as those afforded to HIV-positive people, termination of pregnancy and sexual orientation, women's reproductive rights, freedoms and choices are not respected. There are still experiences of forced sterilisation of women living with HIV, brutal rapes and killings of black lesbians, and the mistreatment and hate speech in the name of morality against women seeking abortions and sex workers. The patriarchal war on female bodies shows no signs of slowing down; but the narratives we encountered also tell the stories of women who are conscious and aware of their power and freedom to determine what happens to their bodies and sexualities. Despite the deafening cries of society telling them no, these women still continue to make their own choices regarding their bodies and their lives.
Our discussion has pointed to the urgency of eradicating all harmful practices towards girls, women and LGBTI people, which are embedded in cultural, religious and mythological beliefs, as they constitute forms of gendered violence against the bodies and lives of individuals. We write from the feminist principle that it is imperative to rethink gendered violence that has been normalised by patriarchy. This paper thus advocates for spaces, policies and action that push the frontiers of patriarchal fundamentalisms embedded in state, family, cultural and religious institutions in South Africa in both individual and collective activism, making this study significant and original in the case of South Africa and a contribution to the eradication of gendered violence embedded in patriarchal African cultures.